Four
percent model
developed by Ned
Davis
Overview
The four
percent model is a trend following model which was
developed by Ned Davis. The four percent model uses
the Value Line Composite Index (KCBT) however, other
traders have applied this model to other indexes.
The Value Line Composite Index is calculated by
Arnold and Bernhard & Co. and is an un-weighted
price index of approximately 1700 stocks.
Application
of model
To construct
this model, the investor is required to record the
weekly close of the value line composite (which
can be found in your newspaper or in Barron's.)
- Buy signals are
generated when the index moves up 4% or more
from any weekly close.
- Sell signals are
generated when the index moves down 4% or more
from any weekly close.
In both
cases, this is 4% not 4 points. Buy signals
continue until a sell signal occurs, and vice versa.
For example: If a buy signal is triggered, a sell
would not occur unless the weekly close is greater
or equal to a 4 % drop or more between weekly closes,
(even if the value line may have had a greater than
4% move during the week).
Historical
Historically,
when testing the 4 % rule, it has shown to be profitable.
Since it is a trend following system it ensures
the trader is on the right side of the trend. Since
the value line composite could not be traded until
1982 (Stock index futures), the following results
are theoretical based on the value of the composite.
In 10/12/1979 the value line composite was at 115.16
until 12/1/1995 the value line composite was at
329.31. During this period the 4 % rule generated
61 buy signals, the average buy signal was active
for 80 calendar days. Of the 61 signals, only 30
were profitable. The average gained in the 30 profitable
trades were 14.1 % per trade, while the 31 unprofitable
trades lost an average of 3.5 %.per trade. The average
gain was 4.7% per trade. when the annualized profit
per year is calculated, it generated a 16.2% gain
from 1966 to march 20, 1996.
Advantages/Disadvantages
The advantage
of using trend following systems is that you are
never really on the wrong side of the trend for
too long, historically they generate profit, as
seen in the example above. It is also important
to note that the average gain was 4.7% per trade,
but when the annualized profit per year is calculated,
it generated a 16.2% gain. Buy and Hold over this
period would have generated .2.7% per year. Trend
following systems require the trading to adhere
to the rules and emotional decisions are extremely
discouraged. The 4% rule is also less demanding
than other trading systems.
The major
disadvantage is that trend following systems generate
signals after the trend has formed or is broken.
Critics of trend following systems argue that entry
signals miss a large part of the up trend, and loses
could be lessened since exit signals are generated
after the trend is broken.
Recommended
Reading: Martin Zweig's, Winning on Wall Street.
|