Acquisitions
and the Aftermath
Acquisition
accounting can wreak havoc on reported earnings
and capital invested for years after an acquisition.
The most common by-product of acquisitions
is goodwill. This amortization of goodwill
can reduce reported earnings in subsequent
periods, though operating income should be
unaffected. Goodwill, as an asset, can inflate
capital invested in subsequent years and reduce
both returns on equity and capital.
Should
we consider amortization of goodwill to be
an expense? We think not, since it is a non-cash
charge, usually with no tax consequences.
The safest route to follow with goodwill amortization
is to look at earnings prior to the amortization
of goodwill. But should goodwill be treated
as part of capital invested? To answer this
question, we need to examine what goes into
goodwill in the first place. Note that goodwill
is strictly a by-product of an acquisition
and is defined to be the difference between
the acquisition price for a company and the
book value of its assets. Since the book value
of a company usually measures the accounting
value of assets in place, there are four components
to goodwill:
a.
Mismeasurement of value of assets in place
of acquired company: The accounting book value
represents capital invested in assets in place.
The market value of these assets can be higher
or lower than this value, depending in large
part on whether these assets generate positive
or excess returns.
b.
Growth assets of target company: For most
firms, growth assets are not captured in the
balance sheet (or book value) since they represent
excess returns from expected future investments.
The market price includes the value of growth
assets and goodwill should be a larger number
for growth companies.
c.
Value of synergy in merger: If there is any
potential synergy in a merger, the price paid
for a target firm may include some or all
of this synergy.
d.
Overpayment for target company: Acquirers
sometimes over pay on acquisition and this
overpayment is part of goodwill.
In
summary, goodwill can be defined as follows:

The
treatment of goodwill will depend in large
part on what goes into it in the first place.
If we accept the notion that return on capital
measures the return on capital invested in
existing assets, the one element of goodwill
that clearly does not belong in capital invested
is the value of growth assets. After all,
a company cannot be asked to generate a return
on investments it has not thought about yet.
The other elements of goodwill, though, should
remain part of capital invested. An acquisition
premium paid for synergy because existing
assets are undervalued should be reflected
in earnings in the short term. Any overpayment
should also be left as part of capital invested,
even though it may lower measured returns,
because it is a reflection of poor investment
decisions made by the firm.
In
theory, then, we would adjust the capital
invested in an acquisitive company (with k
acquisitions) as follows:

The
tricky part, in practice, is working out how
much of goodwill can be attributed to the
growth assets of the acquired firms. It is
not surprising that practitioners revert to
one of two extremes. The first is to assume
that all of the goodwill is due to growth
assets, in which case we net all goodwill
from capital invested.

The
other is to assume that none of goodwill is
for growth assets, in which case capital invested
will include all goodwill.